Is That the Best You Can Do?
As we were setting up our first ever sculpture show, my
partner, Laura, and I, were photographing the pieces. Noticing the absence of one of my oldest sculptures during the photoshoot, Laura asked, "What have you done with The
Ponderer?"
"Oh," I said, "He's on the shelf in the guest
bedroom downstairs."
"You should bring him up for the photos."
By the end of the day, he still had not appeared.
"I'm sensing that you don't like that sculpture very
much?" she said.
I agreed.
But she didn't let it go. "What don't you like about it?"
"It's just I dunno, it's just blocky and dull."
Laura nodded agreement. "Sorta grey?"
Ponderer - 2015 |
"More swampy. I thought it was going to be so
spectacular when I was working on it and then, when I polished it up, it was
just sort of mud coloured."
That conversation while setting up for the show stuck in my
head, and got me thinking about ways to make it less blocky. I brought it
upstairs and started looking at it critically.
I needed to add more detail to make the sculpture effective
from all angles. So, I took it out to our workshop and went at it with the rasps, adding a curve here, a scallop there, and paid lots of
attention to things like harmonious planes and angles and exposing different layers
of colour.
Reflector - back |
Laura had pointed out that I never even bothered to
finish the back of it properly. The part of
the surface that had been left raw was as exciting as concrete. I felt that I should make the shape even more dynamic to make up for the dullness of the colour. But as I got down to the sanding stage, I remembered how high my hopes had been for this sculpture - because the colour and marbling were incredibly vibrant and translucent and transforming – a vivid bolt of golden
lightening running through it. I decided that if I could see all the rich colours and organic detail while sanding, it had to be possible to make it visible in the finished sculpture.
I just needed to do a better job of buffing and waxing. We had much finer sandpaper available now than we had
when I had first worked on The Ponderer in 2010 or thereabouts. The three grades of paper I'd used had finished the piece to a high gloss, but left the viewer with the feeling of glimpsing the colours through six feet of pondwater. If it was possible to bring out the colours, I swore to do it.
I worked on faith for more than a week, doing the sanding an
hour or two at a time. Usually one or two grades a day, through 80, 100, 120,
150, 220, 320, 400, 600, 1200 and 2000. I cleaned up the nooks and crannies as
I went along. I didn't know for sure that the extra effort would pay off until
I reached 600 grit – and it began to glow. The 1200 and 2000 grades of sandpaper made the golds and yellows more vibrant and the contrasts even more dramatic.
The same technique should work on stories.
Why isn't this working? Because it's too expository, doesn't draw the reader in, has shallow characters, ends where it should be starting...yada, yada, yada. If I find an answer, I'll ask myself "How do I fix it?" And then do it. So simple, right? Why don't I do that all the time?
Why isn't this working? Because it's too expository, doesn't draw the reader in, has shallow characters, ends where it should be starting...yada, yada, yada. If I find an answer, I'll ask myself "How do I fix it?" And then do it. So simple, right? Why don't I do that all the time?
Because it works best with a special set of circumstances. It has to be something that inspired me to work at the highest level possible for me at the time. And which I have since gained the skill to execute much more professionally. Revisiting that sculpture made it so clear
what I needed to done and I am so grateful to Laura for urging me to do it.
Comments
Post a Comment